Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Viv entered into a contract with Rodin,an assassin,to kill her ex-husband.She pays him $50,000,but he does not perform the deed.She now wants her money back.Must Rodin return the money?


A) Yes,because the contract is illegal.
B) No,the contract is void because it is illegal.
C) No,the contract is voidable because it is illegal.
D) No,because the contract was not in writing.
E) Yes,if she paid him.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An agreement by a person who issues a letter to pay a sum of money on receipt of an invoice and other documents is called a ________.


A) Letter of credit
B) Letter of acknowledgement
C) Letter of agreement
D) Negotiated credit instrument letter
E) Letter of simple contract

F) B) and D)
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a definition for consideration?


A) Being cordial in the negotiation of contracts.
B) The bargained-for exchange.
C) A contract negotiated in person as opposed to by telephone or e-mail.
D) Being cordial and refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts.
E) Refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts.

F) A) and C)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Contract law is said to be based on a[n] ________ theory,meaning that the existence and interpretation of the contract is based on the outward manifestations of intent by the parties.


A) Interpretive
B) Unilateral
C) Appearing
D) Subjective
E) Objective

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a[n] ________ misunderstanding between the parties exists,and as a result of that misunderstanding the parties do not really come to a meeting of the minds,there is no contract.


A) Unilateral
B) Reasonable
C) Subjective
D) Mutual
E) Comprehensive

F) A) and D)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

All contracts can be categorized as either ________ or ________.


A) Bilateral;complete
B) Unilateral;bilateral
C) Unilateral;complete
D) Unilateral;trilateral
E) Bilateral;trilateral

F) A) and E)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Wrong Deck] Gina hires Jackson over the telephone to paint her back deck.She tells him her address and agrees to pay him $200 for the job,and he accepts.They enter into the agreement on Tuesday,and he is to paint the deck on Saturday.Jackson had a little difficulty finding her house because he spilled coffee on the note where he wrote her address.When Jackson arrives,neither Gina nor her neighbor is at home.He mistakenly paints the neighbor's deck.Gina calls him the next day and asks him why he did not paint her deck.He informs her that he did paint the deck.When it is discovered that he mistakenly painted the neighbor's deck,Gina tells him not to worry because the neighbor will be required to pay him.Jackson says that if the neighbor does not pay,then he expects all of the payment from Gina,because the contract is executed. -As of Tuesday when Jackson and Gina agreed upon the price for the job,what was the status of the agreement?


A) The contract was executory.
B) The contract was formal.
C) The contract was executed.
D) The contract was novated.
E) The contract was a recognizance contract.

F) B) and D)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true about contract law in China?


A) China has seven chapters of general provisions for contracts but also has chapters with special provisions for 15 different types of contracts.
B) China does not have laws regarding contracts.
C) China has general provisions for contracts,but no specific provisions for different types of contracts.
D) China's contacts laws are very similar to those of the United States.
E) China only follows international laws regarding contracts.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Re Zappos.com Inc. ,v.Customer Data Security Breach Litigation,the case in the text in which customers of Zappos claimed that they were not bound to an arbitration agreement contained in a contract with Zappos,what was the result of the case?


A) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that the contract was properly entered into and was fully enforceable.
B) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that even though some provisions of the contract were unenforceable,because of the federal policy favoring arbitration agreements,the arbitration clause itself was enforceable.
C) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
D) The court ruled for the plaintiffs for the following two reasons: 1) there was no contract because plaintiffs did not assent to it,and 2) even if a contract existed,the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
E) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that no contract existed based on the plaintiffs' lack of assent.

F) All of the above
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following statements is true about ESIGN?


A) Documents produced electronically are legally valid,but not as valid as documents produced on paper.
B) E-contracts are formed electronically but executed when printed and signed.
C) ESIGN affirms e-contracts as legally valid.
D) ESIGN is international law.
E) ESIGN stands for the Electronic Signing In Great Numbers.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following describes Dylan's role in the transaction?


A) He was the offeree.
B) He was the assentee.
C) He was the assentor.
D) He was the offeree and the assentee.
E) He was the offeror.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Discuss the meaning of a void contract and a voidable contract,and the effect of a determination that a contract is either void or voidable.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A void contract is in effect not a contr...

View Answer

Which of the following consists of an offer by one party and an acceptance of the terms by another party?


A) Coherence
B) Agreement
C) Legal object
D) Concurrence
E) Alliance

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Dog Training] Nia and Bruno enter into a written contract for Bruno to train Nia's dog.Under the contract,Nia is required to pay Bruno $20 for each training session. -Would their contract be governed by common law or the UCC?


A) Common law.
B) Both common law and the UCC.
C) Common law,because the UCC specifically excludes biological substances.
D) The UCC.
E) Neither common law not the UCC.

F) A) and D)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Contracts do not have to fall under the common law or the Uniform Commercial Code.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If one or both of the parties have the ability to either withdraw from the contract or enforce it,without breaching the contract,the contract is ________.


A) Implied
B) Executed
C) Void
D) Executory
E) Voidable

F) B) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding Yasmeen's claim that she subjectively believed the book was an appropriate edition and that an enforceable contract,therefore,existed?


A) She is correct because agreements for the sale of goods are based on a subjective theory.
B) She is correct because contract law is based upon a subjective theory of contracts.
C) She is correct because her genuinely held belief establishes that she did not commit fraud.
D) She is incorrect because her subjective belief would not be the basis for a determination of whether the contract would be enforced in this case and also because fraud is not necessary in order to find a breach of contract.
E) She is correct but only if Dylan subjectively believed the same as she did.

F) B) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Flo claims that "pigment redesign" in Section 29 is regularly used in the flower business,and that she had every right to "redesign" the color of the arrangements because she is a professional in the business.On which general guideline of contract interpretation is Flo relying?


A) Section 29 is quoting a federal law that allows professionals in the flower business to select color.
B) The four corners rule.
C) The plain language rule.
D) The technical exemption law of the UCC.
E) General guidelines of contract interpretation.

F) C) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Flo claims that pink was proper under Section 29,and any court would interpret the contract in Flo's favor.Would Section 29 likely be enforced?


A) Yes,Serena should have read the contract more carefully and,if there were any ambiguity,she should have clarified it prior to signing.
B) Yes,Section 29 should be interpreted according to its plain language.
C) Yes,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Serena.
D) No,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Flo.
E) Yes,Serena signed the contract.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Serena claims the contract is not valid because she only typed her name onto an electronic form and she did not "sign" any contract.Is she correct?


A) No,because e-contracts are legally valid.
B) Yes.Since she paid the down payment,the contract was executory and e-contracts that are executory are void.
C) Yes,to be valid,she needed to print the form,sign in,and send it in.
D) No,an e-contract is voidable where there is no consideration.
E) Yes,although an e-contract is valid,it is voidable.

F) All of the above
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 89

Related Exams

Show Answer