Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
B) The American Institute of Auditors
C) The Financial Accounting Standards Board
D) The American Accounting and Auditing Standards Board
E) The Federal Accounting Standards Board
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An auditor retained to conduct an annual audit and to furnish an opinion for no particular purpose generally undertakes no duty to third parties.
B) An auditor retained to conduct an annual audit and to furnish an opinion for no particular purpose does undertake a duty to any foreseeable third party users.
C) An auditor retained to conduct an annual audit and to furnish an opinion for no particular purpose undertakes a duty only to third parties who are financial institutions.
D) An auditor retained to conduct an annual audit and to furnish an opinion for no particular purpose generally undertakes a duty only to directors of the company who provide loans to the company.
E) An auditor retained to conduct an annual audit and to furnish an opinion for no particular purpose generally undertakes no duty to third parties except for financial institutions and also directors who provide loans to a company.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Public Accounting Firms Oversight Commission
B) The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
C) The Securities Review Board
D) The Auditing Analysis and Review Board
E) The Certified Public Accountant Commission
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) XYZ Bank will not be able to recover because it was not in privity with Selena.
B) XYZ Bank will not be able to recover because Selena did not know that Bob planned to get a loan from XYZ Bank.
C) XYZ Bank will not be able to recover $100,000 from Selena because the transaction went from $10,000 to $100,000, increasing materially the audit risk.
D) XYZ Bank will be able to recover from Selena because there was privity of contract.
E) XYZ Bank will be able to recover from Selena only if they have been a client of hers in the past.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Generally acknowledged accounting principles only.
B) Generally acknowledged auditing standards only.
C) Generally accepted accounting principles only.
D) Generally accepted auditing standards and generally acknowledged accounting principles.
E) Generally accepted accounting principles and generally accepted auditing standards.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Negligence, breach of contract, and accounting misalignment
B) Breach of contract, fraud, and accounting misalignment
C) Fraud, negligence, and accounting misalignment
D) Breach of contract, negligence, and innocent misrepresentation
E) Negligence, breach of contract, and fraud
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Working papers.
B) Consultation papers.
C) Computation papers.
D) Analysis papers.
E) Review papers.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) All the states utilize it.
B) All states except one utilize it.
C) Three-quarters of the states utilize it.
D) One-half of the states utilize it.
E) Only a few states utilize it.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Rhonda did not commit an ethical violation in disclosing information to Candace unless there was a state law providing for an accountant-client privilege.
B) Regardless of whether a state law existed providing an accountant-client privilege, federal statutory law deems such conduct unethical.
C) Rhonda did not commit an ethical violation because negotiations regarding a prenuptial agreement were involved.
D) Rhonda committed an ethical violation but only because Candace was not yet married to Greg.
E) Rhonda committed an ethical violation.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) There are no affirmative defenses available.
B) Comparative negligence is an affirmative defense.
C) Contributory negligence is an affirmative defense.
D) An affirmative defense exists when the controlling person acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the underlying violation or cause of action.
E) Comparative negligence and contributory negligence are affirmative defenses, and also an affirmative defense exists when the controlling person acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the underlying violation or cause of action.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) All states have adopted it.
B) Three-quarters of the states have adopted it.
C) Half the states have adopted it.
D) Very few states have adopted it.
E) All 50 states have rejected it although it is the proposed rule under the Restatement (Third) of Torts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Ultramares rule
B) The Class test
C) The Reliance Rule
D) The Restatement test
E) The Carroll Rule
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Greg was correct since the accountant-client privilege exists in all states through common law.
B) Greg was incorrect because there is no an accountant-client privilege in any state.
C) Greg was correct because the accountant-client privilege is recognized by federal law.
D) Greg was correct because the accountant-client privilege is recognized in all states through statutory law.
E) More information is needed in order to know if Greg is correct because the accountant-client privilege is recognized in some states, but not in all states.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 67
Related Exams