A) A benefit to the promisee.
B) A detriment to the promisor.
C) A promise to do something.
D) A promise to refrain from doing something.
E) A promise to think about refraining from doing something.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If a business inadvertently cashes such a check, the business has 30 days from the date it cashed that check to offer repayment in the same amount to the debtor to avoid an accord and satisfaction.
B) If a business inadvertently cashes such a check, the business has 60 days from the date it cashed that check to offer repayment in the same amount to the debtor to avoid an accord and satisfaction.
C) If a business inadvertently cashes such a check, the business has 90 days from the date it cashed that check to offer repayment in the same amount to the debtor to avoid an accord and satisfaction.
D) If a business inadvertently cashes such a check, the business has 120 days from the date it cashed that check to offer repayment in the same amount to the debtor to avoid an accord and satisfaction.
E) The business has no recourse, and the debt is deemed discharged and satisfied.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Mia's statement created an illusory promise, which cannot be enforced.
B) Ezra breached the contract because he had an obligation to wait a reasonable length of time for Mia's response, and waiting only two days was not reasonable.
C) Ezra did not breach the contract with Mia because he waited a reasonable amount of time before selling the computer.
D) Ezra did not breach the contract with Mia because it was for the sale of goods and, therefore, a typical contract.
E) Ezra did not breach the contract, but Mia can recover based on promissory estoppel.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The bank is likely to prevail because Ursula only provided past consideration.
B) The bank is likely to prevail because Ursula was tainted by being Victor's girlfriend.
C) The bank is likely to prevail because no valid bilateral contract existed.
D) Ursula is likely to prevail because a valid bilateral contract existed.
E) Ursula is likely to prevail because an enforceable unilateral contract exists based on her provision of information leading to the capture of Victor.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) enforceable because of past consideration.
B) enforceable because it is a preexisting duty.
C) unenforceable because of past consideration.
D) unenforceable because of an illusory promise.
E) unenforceable under promissory estoppel.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Charlie will be required to pay because a typical, unilateral contract is involved, and he got the benefit of his bargain.
B) Charlie will be required to pay because a typical, bilateral contract is involved, and he got the benefit of his bargain.
C) Charlie will be required to pay because unforeseen circumstances are an exception to the preexisting duty rule.
D) Charlie will not be required to pay because Nina provided no additional consideration, and the preexisting duty rule applies.
E) Charlie will only be required to pay ½ of the agreed upon amounts because of the calculations involved under the preexisting duty rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) "I'll take it."
B) "I'll take it if I decide to do so."
C) "I won't pay $75, but I will pay $50."
D) "I'll take it if you will let me try it out first and the brakes work well."
E) "I'll take it if you will buy new tires."
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because there will not be adequate consideration.
B) Because promising to do something you are obligated to do is an illusory promise.
C) Because of the legal doctrine of promissory estoppel.
D) Because there is no detriment.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 81 - 90 of 90
Related Exams