A) Both territorial and customer restrictions are generally analyzed under the rule-of-reason test.
B) Both territorial and customer restrictions are generally analyzed on a per se basis.
C) Territorial restrictions are analyzed under the rule-of-reason test, while customer restrictions are analyzed on a per se basis.
D) Customer restrictions are analyzed under the rule-of-reason test, while territorial restrictions are analyzed on a per se basis.
E) Neither territorial nor customer restrictions are analyzed on any basis because both have been ruled legal in all cases.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) competitive pricing
B) predatory pricing
C) purposeful pricing
D) predominant pricing
E) preeminent pricing
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) horizontal extension merger
B) market extension merger
C) diversification merger
D) analytical merger
E) product extension merger
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) mandatory-dealing contract
B) exclusionary contract
C) exclusive-dealing contract
D) product purchase contract
E) purposeful buyer contract
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is legal.
B) It is legal unless the items at issue may not be used together.
C) It is per se illegal.
D) If the tying arrangement leads to competitive harm, the court will likely find the arrangement to be illegal.
E) The agreement is legal only if use of the wetsuit enhanced the performance of the scuba gear, which is unlikely.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) a monopoly
B) a profiteering
C) a market share
D) a violation of law
E) a profitable company
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) smart business
B) price discrimination
C) predatory pricing
D) discriminatory pricing
E) competitive pricing
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Exclusive dealing
B) Predatory pricing
C) Discriminatory pricing
D) Tying arrangement
E) Horizontal restraint of trade
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct.
B) She is wrong because an agreement that a seller will only carry a seller's merchandise is per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
C) She is wrong because an agreement that a seller will only carry a seller's merchandise is per se illegal under the Clayton Act.
D) Additional information is needed in order to determine whether she violated either the Clayton Act or the Sherman Act because her actions will be reviewed under a rule-of-reason test with the primary inquiry being whether her actions were reasonable in view of competitive practices in the industry.
E) If the agreement lessens competition or tends to create a monopoly, the agreement is in violation of Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Create interlocking directorates.
B) Promote mergers.
C) Enable exclusionary practices.
D) Create price discrimination.
E) Cause significant harm to competition.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The rule-of-reason analysis
B) The per se test
C) The quick-look standard
D) The consumer standard
E) The three-prong analysis
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Price gouging
B) Price profiteering
C) Pricing arrangement
D) Price fixing
E) No violation has occurred since the two are collaborating to se the price.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Exclusive dealing
B) Predatory pricing
C) Discriminatory pricing
D) Tying arrangement
E) Horizontal restraint of trade
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) He was correct.
B) He was incorrect; if a company enjoys 70 percent of the relevant market, the court will usually hold that the firm has monopoly power.
C) He was incorrect; if a company enjoys 60 percent of the relevant market, the court will usually hold that the firm has monopoly power.
D) He was incorrect; if a company enjoys 51 percent of the relevant market, the court will usually hold that the firm has monopoly power.
E) He was incorrect; if a company enjoys 40 percent of the relevant market, the court will usually hold that the firm has monopoly power.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A vertical restraint
B) A horizontal restraint
C) A corresponding restriction
D) An agreed restriction
E) A rule-of-reason restriction
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) How much the company's net worth is.
B) How many stores or manufacturing plants Valmar has.
C) What the relevant market is.
D) How many employees would be impacted if a monopoly is found.
E) What would happen to the stock market if a monopoly is broken up.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 87
Related Exams